MHSIP Values The aim of FN-10 was to help people (mostly managers then) make better decisions about mental health care. None of that has changed. What has changed makes a big difference though. There are more decisions to be made, there are more people making decisions, there are more people involved in defining standards, and there are more areas for which standards are needed. Many of those changes are reflected in the evolution of MHSIP values that has occurred over the last eight to 10 years. Following are values and principles stated in FN-10 and MHSIP documents that have been published since then. It is interesting to note that FN-10 gave lip service to serving a broader audience, but was focused primarily on adult clients and the individual organizations serving them. The Children's Data Task Force report recognized the need to involve families and to look across organizations to integrate data, and used the term "person-based" to describe a preferred data system. Then the Performance Indicator report and the MHSIP Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card document clearly supported the notions of "consumer orientation" and "consumer involvement." Throughout has been the basic call for a common language--i.e., for data standards--so valid comparisons and other data-based decisions can be made. Values from FN-10:
Values from the MHSIP Ad Hoc Group Task Force on Enhancing MHSIP to Meet the Needs of Children: Generally, "services and data to support children's mental health care (should) be forward thinking and flexible enough to accommodate the changes that continue to occur at an accelerated pace." Key principles are:
Values from the MHSIP Ad Hoc Group Task Force on the Design of Performance Indicators Derived from the MHSIP Content:
Values from the MHSIP Task Force on a Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card: A mental health care report card should be consumer oriented-- consumers were involved in every aspect of developing the MHSIP Report Card, and major areas of concern to consumers were addressed: access, appropriateness, outcomes and prevention. A report card should be based on research and explicit values-- literature reviews of performance indicator systems and what people with serious mental illness want from services were conducted, a focus group of consumers was held, and the Task Force explicitly stated the concerns or values the group wanted addressed by the domains of access, appropriateness, outcomes and prevention (see the full task force report for those values). A mental health report card should focus on, but not be limited to, serious mental illness--adults with serious mental illnesses are a major focus of the MHSIP Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card, and many of the indicators and measures have been designed with these individuals in mind. A report card should emphasize the outcomes of treatment--the ask Force acknowledged difficulties with current outcome measures, but "developed the report card based on considerations of what should be measured and not what is conveniently available or easy to measure. Members believe that outcome data will become more accurate as organizations are held accountable for reporting it. In addition, they feel that by defining more clearly the goals and values of the public mental health system, consumers will receive better quality of care, and the broader healthcare community will recognize the effectiveness of mental health and substance abuse treatment."
|
|
|
|